What is 'inductive reasoning' primarily used for in investigations?

Inductive reasoning is primarily utilized in investigations to make generalizations based on specific cases. This method involves collecting specific observations and data, which are then analyzed to draw broader conclusions or develop theories. In the context of fire and explosion investigations, for instance, an investigator might observe specific patterns or evidence in multiple incidents and then use those observations to reach a general conclusion about possible causes or contribute to the understanding of fire behavior.

Inductive reasoning is essential for developing hypotheses that can later be tested or further investigated. By building from specific instances to broader generalizations, investigators can form a more comprehensive view of the situation at hand, allowing them to identify trends, link patterns, or predict possible outcomes. This process supports the development of theories that can guide further investigations or inform safety regulations.

While other options may relate to aspects of the investigative process, they do not specifically capture the essence of inductive reasoning in the way that forming generalizations from specific observations does.